American Liberal Arts Blog

Teaching the Liberal Arts in the American Context
How to Help Students Not Hate Statistics
Print
By Gabriel Martinez, February 24, 2010 in Pedagogy and Teaching

It's hard to love your Statistics course. Many students majoring in the social sciences are required to take it, but rarely do they enjoy the long list of tools that must be learned; and the curious way in which one must twist one’s mind to understand the concepts.

I took Statistics in the second millennium, which means that we didn’t use computers at all. We had to memorize concepts and definitions, and learn how we would use tools, assuming we ever had access to data and to the computer power (and/or the time) to actually use them.

I think this is a very unsatisfactory way to teach, period. In my course, students learn the concepts and learn how to use them pretty much simultaneously. They see, for instance, the meaning of “standard deviation” not just from seeing a picture in a book, drawn from a hypothetical (i.e., made up) data set, but from typing in the right commands to analyze data that they can actually see.

One of the great pitfalls is the use of fake data, which are nice, clean, and unrealistic. Many textbooks nowadays come with a CD (or a website) full of data drawn out of real examples. My sense is that this data still feels fake: it was collected by someone else, for some purpose that had nothing to do with my class.

So every time I have taught the class, I have had my students carry out an extensive survey of what they know best—the student body. They actually collect the data (which is worth the course in itself, I think), input it, and analyze it. Because they actually know what it is to be a student, they can develop sensible and fairly sophisticated hypotheses, which they test scientifically and present to their peers.

This highly hands-on way of teaching Statistics has an added benefit: upper-division classes, most often, deal with the application of the theoretical tools learned in the theory classes (mostly Intermediate Macro and Micro) to specific aspects of economic life (from industrial organization to developing countries).

Most practicing economists approach reality with a mix of theory and empirical analysis. Traditionally, undergraduates have been shut out of empirical analysis because it is too hard (it is) and because they don’t know how to apply the tools they’ve learned about in Statistics to the data. By giving students plenty of experience in the use of statistical analysis on data that they actually understand, our major makes it easy for them to understand reality a bit better.

Tags: Economics, Education

2 Comments
Gary Scott on Feb 24, 2010 at 11:52 am

Bravo Gabriel! The great historian of economics, Joseph Schumpeter, wrote in 1954 that, "An adequate command of modern statistical methods is a necessary (but not a sufficient) condition for preventing the modern economist from producing nonsense…"

And we might add that a statistic is a number, a factoid out of context. Statistics is the science of inference---what can we say fairly about something unknown with something we do know?

Lee Trepanier on Feb 25, 2010 at 8:05 am

I think what you have outlined is a great way to make statistics approachable to students. Most students complain that, even though they know how to do it, they don't see the point of it.

about the author

Gabriel Martinez
Gabriel Martinez

I am Associate Professor of Economics and Chairman of the Department of Economics at Ave Maria University. I have been in the Economics Department since its beginning and have taught over fifteen different courses at Ave Maria University, particularly in the areas of macroeconomics, international economics, development economics, Catholic social teaching, economic history, and social philosophy. My two favorite courses to teach are Intermediate Macroeconomics and Markets, State, and Institutions.

My work is in the general area of international finance and open-economy macroeconomics, with a focus on developing countries. My dissertation focused on the 1999 economic collapse in Ecuador,using a combination of historical, theoretical, and empirical analyses. My paper on the role of deregulation, moral hazard, and overconfidence in the Ecuadorian financial crisis was published by the Cambridge Journal of Economics. Financial crises are a perennial topic, with causes that are complex and deep, inextricably intermingled with politics and ethics. My Ph.D. is from the University of Notre Dame.